Policy Brief

The EU and China: Sanctions, Signals, and Interests

Publication Date
20 May 2021
Author
Sven Biscop
External Series
Security Policy Brief
Journal
Security Policy Brief, Volume 141
External link

Sanctions are much easier to use against your allies than against your enemies. A friend will want to stay in your good books, and is much more likely to modify his behaviour than an adversary, who will probably just harden his resolve to outdo you. The Trump administration liberally used sanctions against allies in Europe and Asia, who did not exactly cave in but did not want things to escalate either. The US trade war with China, on the other hand, cost both sides dearly, without resolving anything.

In a coordinated move with the US, the UK, and Canada, the EU has adopted sanctions against four Chinese officials and one entity for violating the human rights of the Uighur people in Xinjiang province. That is fully legitimate: as a union of democracies, the EU has a moral duty to speak up for human rights everywhere. But are sanctions the most effective way of doing so?

Related content

Blog Post

Can AI Generate Solutions to Life's Problems?

What do the new transparency obligations under the EU AI Act (2024/1689) address, and are they effective against AI-driven emotional manipulation?

14 Aug 2026

Event

UNU-CRIS and the Bhutan Knowledge Exchange and Capacity-Building Programme

This programme is a strategic knowledge-exchange and capacity-building initiative between the Kingdom of Bhutan and UNU-CRIS.

-

Journal Article

An Actor-Interest-Power (AIP) governance indicator framework for operationalising the Actor-Centred Power approach

This publication was released as part of the UNU Resource Nexus Focus Area Resilient Food, Forest and Ecosystems.

14 Aug 2026