Policy Brief

One Year Later: What Lessons Should Policymakers and Scholars From the EU Draw From Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine?

This policy brief argues that scholars should no longer study the countries in Eastern Europe from the angle of EU-Russia competition, rather they need to account more explicitly for the agency of these countries.

 

The war has painstakingly revealed that policymakers and scholars knew little about Ukraine. This lack of knowledge led to significant misinterpretations of Ukraine as a country and its relationship with Russia.

 

Ukraine occupies a central role in Russia’s historical imagination and identity construction. Even if a peace agreement is reached between Ukraine and Russia, it is highly likely that Russia will continue to harass Ukraine, because in Moscow’s view, Ukraine has no historical right to exist as a sovereign state.

 

Now that the EU has fully embraced Ukraine by offering it unprecedented military, moral and financial support to fight Russia, as well as by offering it a membership perspective, the EU needs to move to a Russia-second, and others-first policy. 

Related content

Blog Post

Can AI Generate Solutions to Life's Problems?

What do the new transparency obligations under the EU AI Act (2024/1689) address, and are they effective against AI-driven emotional manipulation?

14 Aug 2026

Journal Article

An Actor-Interest-Power (AIP) governance indicator framework for operationalising the Actor-Centred Power approach

This publication was released as part of the UNU Resource Nexus Focus Area Resilient Food, Forest and Ecosystems.

14 Aug 2026

Project

Research on Trends in International Climate Security Rulemaking

Practical input and recommendations for enhancing international and regional cooperation on climate change amid geopolitical fragmentation.

14 Aug 2026