Journal Article

A Forgotten Group During Humanitarian Crises: A Systematic Review of Sexual and Reproductive Health Interventions for Young People Including Adolescents in Humanitarian Settings

Although SRH interventions for youth exist, insufficient specification of components and outcomes constrains their comprehensive evaluation

Date Published
15 May 2026
Authors
Lauren Jennings Asha S. George Tanya Jacobs Karl Blanchet Neha S. Singh

INTRODUCTION

Synthesising findings of nine peer-reviewed articles and five pieces of grey literature, this systematic review compiles current literature on approaches to improve sexual and reproductive health (SRH) intervention utilisation and outcomes for adolescents in humanitarian settings, and reports that almost all articles indicated some outcome improvements related to SRH, mostly in knowledge and attitudes.

There are two key reasons to build gender equitable health systems in post-conflict contexts. First, ensuring that health system reform builds gender equitable systems will improve the operation and responsiveness of health systems with the goal of improving health outcomes. And second, emerging research suggests that gender equality facilitates broader social and economic wellbeing, as well as stability. Ensuring that the reconstruction and reform of health systems creates gender equitable systems can facilitate gender equality.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  1. Common strategies

    Some common strategies for these approaches and programmes included use of peer workers, involving adolescents in a programmatic role, community engagement efforts, mobile clinics, and school-based activities.

  2. Evidence base should be strengthened

    Despite international commitments to better serve adolescents in this area of health, there is a scarcity of high-quality literature showing robustly measured positive outcomes from programmatic implementation in this setting. Half of the articles reported no improvements on other dimensions of SRH. Hence, future interventions could benefit from a gender transformative approach, targeting both young men and girls.

  3. High quality and sex- and age-disaggregated data needed

    There must also be high quality and sex- and age-disaggregated data collected on SRH intervention outcomes in humanitarian settings.

  4. Limitations exist in the current evidence

    There are also vital dimensions to SRH that were not discussed in the literature including prevention of maternal-to-child transmission, safe abortion, post-abortion care, urogenital fistulae or female genital mutilation.

Download Journal Article.

Related content

Journal Article

Delivering health interventions to women, children, and adolescents in conflict settings: what have we learned from ten country case studies?

The study presents insights on delivery challenges and innovative strategies in advancing WCH and SRH interventions within humanitarian settings.

15 May 2026

Journal Article

Health systems and gender in post-conflict contexts: building back better?

Exposing the gender-blindness of health sector reforms in post-conflict contexts, this article explores how to build gender equitable health systems

15 May 2026

Journal Article

Women on the move: migration, care work and health

The report focuses on migrant women care workers, who play a critical role in supporting positive health outcomes while facing omitted vulnerabilities

15 May 2026

Journal Article

A synthesis of convergent reflections, tensions and silences in linking gender and global environmental change research

This article compiles the views of authors of "Gender perspective in resilience, vulnerability, and adaptation to global environmental change"

15 May 2026