Policy Brief
Who Do You Think We Are? Recommendations to Improve our Knowledge of the Composition of Multistakeholder Participation at the IGF
This Policy Brief draws on the public IGF participation lists from 2006 to 2019 in which we analysed how individual participants chose to identify their stakeholder categories. We subsequently analyse the data to address the following questions:
1. How have stakeholders identified themselves in comparison to their allocation in the internet governance stakeholder framework, and where do the discrepancies lie?
2. Have individuals maintained their roles during different editions of the IGF?
3. Have stakeholders moved between stakeholder groups?
Addressing these questions will give us the means to open up a space for critical reflection on the multistakeholder model at the IGF.
Related content
News
14th Doctoral School on Latin American, European and Comparative Regionalism Kicks Off in Quito
On Monday, 13 July, our Doctoral School on Latin American, European and Comparative Regionalism successfully took off in Quito, Ecuador.
Project
Public Service Delivery in Uzbekistan: Data-Driven Training in Tashkent and Study Visit in Portugal
Enhance public service performance monitoring and data-driven governance in Uzbekistan.
Degree Defense
PhD Defence: Parity and Prejudice Inquiries into Social Media, Gender Inequality, and Development
Praachi Kumar