This PhD thesis explores various aspects of science evaluation, with a focus on the peer review process. Peer review is a critical mechanism for maintaining the quality of scientific research, but little is known about how it actually operates. The research examines factors influencing paper selection, the duration of peer review, and the role of reviewer comments. The key findings indicate that while paper quality plays a significant role in the peer review process, author reputation is important for junior researchers. Additionally, papers that attract more attention tend to go through peer review faster, and reviewers are more likely to praise authors with whom they share cultural similarities. The study also addresses the growing demand for digital skills in the scientific workforce, analyzing job advertisements to highlight trends in digital competencies such as data analysis and programming. Overall, the thesis provides insights into peer review behavior and the impact of digitalization on the scientific community.
Degree Defense
Essays on Science Evaluation
PhD defence Guangyao Zhang.
Related content
Event
On-line training on science, technology and innovation policy and policy instruments for Africa
UN-IATT Work Stream 6 on Capacity-Building in STI for SDGs will organise three online training sessions on 19, 21 and 26 May 2025 to enhance STI policy-making for SDGs, targeting African stakeholders and open to global participants.
News
UN Advisory Body Addresses Governance, Science-based Solutions for the SDGs
UNU-IAS provided expert inputs at the 2025 meeting of the UN Committee of Experts on Public Administration in New York.
Seminar
Shielding the few and perpetrating the pattern for the many: interaction of gender discrimination and status in predicting promotion
MAASTRICHT & ONLINE: Our UNU-MERIT Seminar Series team is pleased to announce our upcoming research seminar featuring Giulio Marini, a Senior Assistant Professor at the University of Catania, Italy.