Conference Paper

Online Usability and Service Standards in the Federal Context: A Comparative Analysis of Australia and Canada

Publication Date
21 Aug 2025
Authors
Morten Meyerhoff Nielsen Luís Nuno Barbosa
External Series
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Journal
Electronic Participation. ePart 2025., Volume 15978
External link

This paper develops an analytical framework based on the usability principles of Jacob Nielsen and Ben Shneiderman to examine how federal systems approach online service design standards. Focusing on Australia and Canada, the paper explores the interplay between federal and regional-level design standards and manuals, highlighting the challenges and complementarities in achieving consistency across government levels. Being the only country with design standards uniformly applied across all levels of government, Denmark is referred to in the analysis. The paper finds that while most approaches align with Nielsen’s and Shneiderman’s recommendations, they differ in their implementation, compliance mechanisms, and inter-governmental coordination. The paper concludes with a set of policy recommendations for federal contexts.

Related content

Article

The New Digital Geography of Risk: Sustainable AI, Resilient AI, and the Role of Digital Government

Nations need reliable, carbon-free baseload power to participate in the AI economy. It's now a requirement, not an advantage.

08 Oct 2026

Event

From Principle to Practice: Operationalizing Climate Justice

This webinar will explore how climate justice can be defined, measured and turned into policy.

-

Symposium

2023 Gender and Health Hub Virtual Forum | Evidence. Voice. Action: Catalysing Change for Gender and Health Equality

The Forum spotlighted advancements, fostered knowledge sharing, and showcased evidence and lived experience in advancing gender equality in health

-

Event

Integrating Gender and Sex Informed Evidence into Tobacco Control Policy and Practice: What Works?

Part of the Gender & Health Series, this webinar explores current evidence and where gender-specific tobacco control efforts should be concentrated

-